The Kenya Integrated Elections Management System (KIEMS) was supposed to be the backbone of electoral integrity in 2022. At a cost of KES 8 billion, the system handled biometric voter identification, electronic results transmission, and voter verification across 46,229 polling streams in 28,080 polling stations. It mostly worked. But where it didn't, the consequences were significant.
What KIEMS Was Supposed to Do
Each KIEMS kit — essentially a ruggedized tablet with a fingerprint scanner — had three critical functions:
- Biometric identification: Verify each voter's fingerprint against the register before issuing a ballot
- Alphanumeric verification: Manual ID number lookup as backup when biometrics failed
- Results transmission: Photograph and transmit Form 34A (polling station results) to the national tallying centre
IEBC Chairman Chebukati had assured the nation that redundancy was built into the system. Each kit had dual SIM cards (Safaricom and Airtel), satellite backup, and pre-loaded voter registers. In theory, failure was nearly impossible.
The Failure Map
According to data compiled from election observer reports, IEBC incident logs, and court filings during the Supreme Court petition, kit failures were not random. They clustered in specific geographic and technical patterns:
High-failure counties (10+ reported incidents):
- Turkana County: 32 kits experienced connectivity failures due to poor network coverage in remote areas
- Marsabit County: 28 kits failed biometric verification at rates exceeding 30%
- Mandera County: 24 kits had battery failures, some within 4 hours of polls opening
- Wajir County: 19 kits failed to transmit results electronically
- Samburu County: 18 kits malfunctioned, with 7 requiring complete replacement mid-day
Moderate-failure counties (5-9 reported incidents):
- Nairobi County: 9 kits failed in high-density areas including Kibera, Mathare, and Kawangware
- Mombasa County: 7 kits experienced fingerprint scanner malfunctions
- Kilifi County: 6 kits lost power due to charging infrastructure issues
- Kakamega County: 5 kits had software crashes requiring restarts
The Biometric Failure Rate
Even where kits were technically functional, biometric verification was far from perfect. Across the country, the average biometric failure rate was 4.7%, meaning roughly 1 in 20 voters could not be verified by fingerprint and had to use the alphanumeric (manual ID) backup.
This rate was not uniform:
- Arid and semi-arid counties: 8-12% failure rate (calloused hands from manual labour)
- Urban counties: 2-3% failure rate
- Elderly voters (65+): Estimated 15-20% biometric failure rate
With 14.2 million voters casting ballots, a 4.7% biometric failure rate means approximately 667,000 voters required manual verification — a process that added 2-3 minutes per voter and contributed to long queues.
Results Transmission: The Real Test
The most critical KIEMS function was results transmission. After tallying, presiding officers were required to photograph Form 34A and transmit it electronically to the constituency and national tallying centres.
The IEBC reported that 97.2% of Form 34As were transmitted electronically within the first 48 hours. The remaining 2.8% — representing approximately 1,294 polling stations — relied on physical delivery of forms, primarily in North Eastern and pastoral counties.
However, transmission success didn't mean transmission quality. The Supreme Court petition revealed that approximately 4,000 Form 34As had quality issues — poor image resolution, incomplete data, or missing security features — that complicated verification.
What Went Wrong, Technically
Post-election technical audits identified several root causes:
- Battery life: Some kits were rated for 12 hours but depleted in 8 due to continuous biometric scanning in high-volume stations
- Network coverage: KIEMS relied on commercial mobile networks, which remain patchy in 15 of 47 counties
- Software bugs: A firmware update pushed 72 hours before election day caused intermittent crashes on approximately 350 kits
- Training gaps: Some presiding officers struggled with the results transmission workflow, leading to delays
- Environmental factors: Extreme heat in North Eastern Kenya caused some kits to overheat and shut down
Implications for 2027
The KIEMS experience in 2022 was a significant improvement over the 2017 disaster, where the entire electronic transmission system collapsed. But 'better than catastrophic' is not the same as 'good enough.'
For 2027, IEBC will need to address the geographic inequality in technology performance. A voter in Turkana should have the same confidence in the system as a voter in Nairobi. This means investing in offline-capable systems, longer battery life, and satellite transmission as a primary (not backup) channel in remote areas.
Independent vote tracking systems like Votrack provide a critical check on official technology. When KIEMS fails, parallel tallying operations can fill the data gap.
Want to see how technology-independent vote tracking works? Request a Votrack demo today.
Share this article
Need Real-Time Election Tracking?
Votrack provides secure, parallel vote tallying for every electoral position in Kenya.
Learn More About Votrack
